Today, I was reminded of the importance of creating and maintaining a good classroom culture. Since it was April Fool's, my supervising teacher and I planned out a joke to play on our 5th grade students. Upon arriving today, the students were told that the teacher was at a meeting and that the substitute was running late, so that the lesson plan of the day would be given to a student to be in charge to guide the class through the day until the substitute arrived. When the students asked me to be their substitute for the day, I'd simply state that I was only there to observe that day and that we should follow the supervising teacher's instructions. While I remained in the room to address any "chaos" that might arise, the supervising teacher was in a different room of the building and could be contacted instantly if necessary. The students followed their normal Monday routine schedule in general and also had a few presentations. The class found the situation a little strange but went along with it anyways and to my surprise, the class seemed to run itself. They performed their tasks as they normally would, finished and started activities on time, and were well behaved generally. They knew what was expected of them and they did it. They managed themselves from the beginning of school at 7:30am to lunch and recess time at around noon, when the supervising teacher returned.
The overall culture and feel of a classroom can be beneficial to a student's development and learning. As an educator, I would hope to create a respectable and productive learning community for my students such as the one mentioned above in which the students take ownership over their own learning in a safe, respectable place that promotes positive student engagement and interactions with one another.
Jayce's Literacy Blog
Monday, April 1, 2013
Monday, March 25, 2013
Interactive Read-Alouds
Interactive read-alouds allows teachers to model the reading prcess through think-alounds and discussions as they help readers engage with the books in a safe, risk-free environment because children's listening and receptive levels are mush stronger than the level of books they can read independently. Below are some types of books to consider and purposes for selected texts:
Types:
Types:
- Texts by favorite authors.
- Recommendations from other teachers.
- Online sites and blogs.
- Orbis Pictus award winners.
- Books relating to curriculum topics.
- Reviews in magazines, professional journals, or newspapers.
- Newbery or Caldecott medal or honor books.
Purposes:
- Allows for think-alouds to guide strategic strategies such as inferring, questioning, and visualizing.
- Allows for text to text connections.
- Allows for character, setting, or plot developments.
- Builds classroom community.
- Helps develop content-area curriculum.
- Helps students discover ideas for writing.
- Allows for study of topics of interest such as genre, author, or topic.
- Provides examples of playful language.
- Expands on students' vocabulary.
During these interactive read-alouds, it is also important to allow students time to talk with one another and discuss what they've just read or heard. This aids in their reading comprehension because it forces them to think about the text. This time also allows educators to gain the opportunity to see what readers do and how the students think and to design their instruction to efficiently establish a solid foundation for children as they become independent readers.
Monday, March 18, 2013
Inferences Today
As educators, we should strive to be more aware about the concept of inferring, allow even the youngest readers many opportunities for inferring within their books, and share and model ideas to illustrate the importance of summarizing.
Sunday, March 3, 2013
Sunday, February 24, 2013
Representing Miscue Analyses
Educators use miscue analysis to reveal whether students are flexibly using syntactic, semantic, and graphophonic systems for meaning-making with a text by asking four essential questions:
- Does it sound like normal language?
- Does what they say make sense?
- Does the reading change the meaning of the sentence in a way that matters in the whole text?
- Are the miscues graphophonically similar to the text?
A spider or radar chart shown below is a useful visual representation that easily depicts the strengths and weaknesses in strategies the child is using. Try it below! (Be sure to enter values between 0-100)
Here are also some signs to look out for that may demonstrate a preference in strategy that a child may be using:
Sunday, February 17, 2013
Leveling - A Double Edged Sword
Upon reflecting on Glasswell & Ford's article, "Lets Start Leveling About Leveling," I'm reminded that while leveling is based off the idea that children need to spend time with texts that can help them grow and develop as readers, an unintentional orthodoxy has been observed that has resulted in a focus on inflexible implementation of the "one right way" to engage and address that goal. It is observed that a teacher's judgement has diminished in the leveling process and lists and numbers increasingly replaced those judgments.
As educators, it is necessary to remember that leveling systems are unable to assess whether a child is reading in an emotionally safe and comfortable setting and that they only acknowledge reader factors that can quickly be assessed and interpreted. This method of quick, efficient assessment has unintentionally masked the complexity of the text factors at play in determining why a book is considered more difficult than another for any given reader on any given day.
We should be reminded that the job of the teacher is to stay attuned to those complex influencing factors when choosing texts for our students and to be more flexible in thinking about a reader's needs. The selected texts should be both age appropriate and engaging for the reader in order to stimulate the reader's thinking. In the end, a teacher's professional judgement still remains the critical factor in planning and implementing successful reading instruction.
For the original source & article, Glasswell & Ford's article, "Lets Start Leveling About Leveling," can be found in the journal: Language Arts, Volume 88, No. 3, January 2011.
As educators, it is necessary to remember that leveling systems are unable to assess whether a child is reading in an emotionally safe and comfortable setting and that they only acknowledge reader factors that can quickly be assessed and interpreted. This method of quick, efficient assessment has unintentionally masked the complexity of the text factors at play in determining why a book is considered more difficult than another for any given reader on any given day.
We should be reminded that the job of the teacher is to stay attuned to those complex influencing factors when choosing texts for our students and to be more flexible in thinking about a reader's needs. The selected texts should be both age appropriate and engaging for the reader in order to stimulate the reader's thinking. In the end, a teacher's professional judgement still remains the critical factor in planning and implementing successful reading instruction.
For the original source & article, Glasswell & Ford's article, "Lets Start Leveling About Leveling," can be found in the journal: Language Arts, Volume 88, No. 3, January 2011.
Monday, February 11, 2013
It Happened "Auto-schema-tically"
Last Thursday, I was sitting in my Art Methods course and the professor read a passage called "The Great Peace." While I didn't know it at the time, the passage was taken from an old Iroquois Legend about The Peacemaker and the Tree of Peace. The passage spoke of a tree whose roots spread into the four directions: one to the north, one to the south, one to the east, and one to the west:
"Into the depths of the earth, down into the deep under earth currents of water flowing into unknown regions, we cast all weapons of strife. We bury them from sight forever and plant again the tree. Thus shall all Great Peace be established and hostilities shall no longer be known between the Five Nations but only peace to a united people."
"We have completed our power so that we the Five Nations Confederacy shall in the future have one body, one mind, and one heart. If any evil should befall us in the future, we shall stand or fall united as one man."
After reading the passage to the class, the professor asked us to draw an image that represented our interpretation of the passage. Many of my classmates began drawing beautiful and creative drawings of trees. However while I was listening to the passage, it did not occur to me that the passage was truly about a tree, and thus I was viewing it from a symbolic perspective. Therefore, I began to draw in my sketchpad the Shield of Achilles (which I've never seen) based upon a text-to-self/world connection. I remember watching a movie in which the argument was posed that the scenes of normal life depicted on Achilles' shield suggested an alternative to war. I thought that a shield is something in which weapons are cast upon. A shield could have a cross pointing in all directions as a compass. A shield could be called a tree since it's made of wood. Lastly, it could be divided into 5 sections to symbolize the Five Nations that was mentioned.
This particular experience made me realize and further understand the concept of schemas and how we automatically use our background knowledge and what we already know to make sense of what we experience. As educators, it is important to note that students also learn and make sense of things by starting off with what they know. By utilizing this natural tendency of our students, we can hope to increase their understanding beyond the text through the many connections that they can make to the text.
"Into the depths of the earth, down into the deep under earth currents of water flowing into unknown regions, we cast all weapons of strife. We bury them from sight forever and plant again the tree. Thus shall all Great Peace be established and hostilities shall no longer be known between the Five Nations but only peace to a united people."
"We have completed our power so that we the Five Nations Confederacy shall in the future have one body, one mind, and one heart. If any evil should befall us in the future, we shall stand or fall united as one man."
After reading the passage to the class, the professor asked us to draw an image that represented our interpretation of the passage. Many of my classmates began drawing beautiful and creative drawings of trees. However while I was listening to the passage, it did not occur to me that the passage was truly about a tree, and thus I was viewing it from a symbolic perspective. Therefore, I began to draw in my sketchpad the Shield of Achilles (which I've never seen) based upon a text-to-self/world connection. I remember watching a movie in which the argument was posed that the scenes of normal life depicted on Achilles' shield suggested an alternative to war. I thought that a shield is something in which weapons are cast upon. A shield could have a cross pointing in all directions as a compass. A shield could be called a tree since it's made of wood. Lastly, it could be divided into 5 sections to symbolize the Five Nations that was mentioned.
This particular experience made me realize and further understand the concept of schemas and how we automatically use our background knowledge and what we already know to make sense of what we experience. As educators, it is important to note that students also learn and make sense of things by starting off with what they know. By utilizing this natural tendency of our students, we can hope to increase their understanding beyond the text through the many connections that they can make to the text.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)